Water Jug Rewrite With Haskell Part I
The Water Jug problem is a famous problem commonly found in AI texts and there are few different version of it like:
I had to do the same problem in my own college days and at the time I was learning python and thought it might be an interesting problem to solve with python. Looking at the code now I feel embarrassed...I am not even sure how I got it working! Rewriting it in python seems rather uninteresting now, so I would prefer using a static functional language like Haskell, which seemed to make it more interesting. Obviously, once you look at the code you will realize currently I don't know much of Haskell either, so...rather than trying to solve the problem in one shot, I decided to limit the initial version some what.
There can be some Water Jars, with any given capacity. The challenge will be to start from that to reach the given final state which will be get some specified quantity of water in these Jars. These Jugs have no measurements. But you know the full capacity of the Jugs.
As a starting point max number of Jars will be limited to two.
One of the most interesting things about writing in a language like Haskell is how Types and data become powerful design tools. So to start with let us define
State which is the combination of
-- WaterJug.hs -- Jug capacity, holding data Jug = Jug Int Int deriving (Show, Eq, Ord) -- State left right data State = State Jug Jug deriving (Show, Eq, Ord) -- Problem initial state, destination state data Problem = Problem State State deriving (Show, Eq, Ord) -- StateMap, type alias type StateMap = M.Map State [State] emptyJug :: Int -> Jug emptyJug c = Jug c 0 newProblem :: Int -> Int -> Int -> Int -> Problem newProblem rc lc r l = Problem (State (emptyJug rc) (emptyJug lc)) (State (Jug rc r) (Jug lc l))
deriving ensures that we can have reasonable string representation for these objects, they can be equated to each other, ordered etc.
All these types we created using data are tuples. They can only contain two arguments. They are also positional.
emptyJug function can be used to create an empty
Jug of any given capacity.
newProblem function can be used to define a problem which include jug capacities and the final state we want to achieve.
Possible Operations on Given Jugs
Jugs you can do 6 operations. Depending on what state each
Jugs are in only some of these operations will be valid at any given state.
The operations are
- given a
Jugthat has liquid less that full, it can be made full.
haskell forRightFull :: State -> Maybe State forRightFull (State (Jug rc rh) lj) | rc <= rh = Nothing | otherwise = Just $ State (Jug rc rc) lj
- Given a
Jugthat is non empty and the other
Jughas some space left, Some of the liquid can be poured from this to the other one.
haskell forRightToLeft :: State -> Maybe State forRightToLeft (State (Jug rc rh) (Jug lc lh)) | rh == 0 || lc <= lh = Nothing | otherwise = Just $ State (Jug rc (rh -liquidToTransfer)) (Jug lc (lh + liquidToTransfer)) where liquidToTransfer = if maxCanPour >= rh then rh else maxCanPour maxCanPour = lc - lh
- Given a non empty
Jugit can be emptied.
haskell forRightToEmpty :: State -> Maybe State forRightToEmpty (State (Jug rc rh) lj) | rh == 0 = Nothing | otherwise = Just $ State (empty rc) lj
- These operations can be replicated on second
Jugas is except the
Jugs should be reversed.
interchangeis a function to help with that.
haskell interchange :: (State -> Maybe State) -> State -> Maybe State interchange f (State rj lj) = case f (State lj rj) of Nothing -> Nothing Just (State rj' lj') -> Just (State lj' rj')
- operations for the left written using operations for right and
haskell forLeftFull :: State -> Maybe State forLeftFull = interchange forRightFull forLeftToRight :: State -> Maybe State forLeftToRight = interchange forRightToLeft forLeftToEmpty :: State -> Maybe State forLeftToEmpty = interchange forRightToEmpty
A few interesting things to note here. All the action functions have the same signature.
interchange takes a function as first parameter and we are partially applying it giving us the exact type signature we required. Their common type allows us to put all these functions in a
list...an important feature we will be using next. We use
Maybe) type which allows us denote irrelevant actions on given state.
Compute Next States
State, you can apply all these functions to get all the possible next
State we can take the Jars to. I ended up doing that like so:
haskell getNextState :: State -> [State] getNextState s = catMaybes $ map (\f -> f s) toNextStates where toNextStates = [forRightToLeft, forRightToEmpty, forLeftFull, forLeftToRight, forLeftToEmpty, forRightFull]
toNextStates is a list of the functions that were defined in the previous section. The only way all these functions can be put in a single list is if they have the same signature.
catMaybes filters out all the
Nothings and takes out the
Just values. Thus leaving us with actual/relevant changes.
Finding relevent states
Now given a starting state and final state, we try to find all the possible states between them. The
allStates function is a kind of wrapper for the inner
allStates calls the inner functions with a correct set of initial arguments, which implements most of the logic.
haskell allStates :: Problem -> StateMap allStates (Problem i f) = let allStates' :: State -> S.Set State -> StateMap -> StateMap allStates' current queue m | S.null queue = m | otherwise = allStates' next queue'' m' where ns = getNextState current -- insert current state and its possible transitions to the StateMap m' = M.insert current ns m queue' = S.delete current queue -- filter out all the states that have already been visited. new_q = S.fromList $ filter (\s -> M.notMember s m) ns -- if final state is in one of these, we dont care for other transitions -- from that point queue'' = if S.member f new_q then queue' else S.union queue' new_q next = head $ S.toList queue'' in allStates' i (S.fromList [i]) M.empty
You can think of the
where clauses as being executed top to bottom. In reality though they are all lazy and could be executed as and when the need arises, so order has no meaning.
Is there a possible path from initial to final state?
Once we have the
StateMap we should be able to find if there is a possible path from initial to final state. For that we flatten out the values of
StateMap and check if the final state is one of
haskell isPathPossible :: Problem -> StateMap -> Bool isPathPossible (Problem _ f) m = S.member f $ S.fromList $ concat $ M.elems m
Find Paths from Initial to Final State
Once we know there is a path, we walk the
StateMap depth first to find possible paths to the final state. We look at this like a tree with initial state as the root node. When we find a path that reaches the final state we add that to possible paths and continue with our search. One of the optimizations we do is, if we find cycles, ie same state being repeated we end our search on that branch. Similarly if a state is not in
StateMap once again we end our search on that branch. In all other cases we fold over next states and call
findPaths' are similar to
allStates' in that
findPaths is mostly a limited wrapper over the inner function which implements most of the logic.
haskell findPaths :: Problem -> StateMap -> [[State]] findPaths (Problem i f) m = findPaths' [i]  where findPaths' :: [State] -> [[State]] -> [[State]] findPaths' (x:xs) ps -- we have found a cycle, return the routes we have found -- and end the search on this branch | x `elem` xs = ps -- found a full path, add that to routes and end branch | x == f = (reverse $ x:xs):ps | otherwise = case M.lookup x m of Nothing -> ps Just ls -> foldl (\ps' l-> findPaths' (l:x:xs) ps') ps ls
Shortest of the Paths
Now that we have a bunch of candidates for paths to final state, its time to find the shortest one. For that we just compare the length of each of the paths like so:
haskell shortestPath :: [[State]] -> [State] shortestPath ps = foldl (\a x -> if (length a) > (length x) then x else a) (head ps) (tail ps)
Putting it all together
Now we have all the pieces to solve a given
haskell solve :: Problem -> Maybe [State] solve p = if isPathPossible p ss then Just $ shortestPath $ findPaths p ss else Nothing where ss = allStates p
The returned type is a bit interesting, it says given a
Problem maybe we have a solution to get from initial to final state. :)
To conclude for now let me present a simple REPL session.
haskell > :l WaterJug.hs > solve $ newProblem 4 3 2 2 Nothing > > solve $ newProblem 5 3 4 0 Just [State (Jug 5 0) (Jug 3 0),State (Jug 5 5) (Jug 3 0),State (Jug 5 2) (Jug 3 3),State (Jug 5 2) (Jug 3 0),State (Jug 5 0) (Jug 3 2),State (Jug 5 5) (Jug 3 2),State (Jug 5 4) (Jug 3 3),State (Jug 5 4) (Jug 3 0)] > > solve $ newProblem 4 3 2 0 Just [State (Jug 4 0) (Jug 3 0),State (Jug 4 0) (Jug 3 3),State (Jug 4 3) (Jug 3 0),State (Jug 4 3) (Jug 3 3),State (Jug 4 4) (Jug 3 2),State (Jug 4 0) (Jug 3 2),State (Jug 4 2) (Jug 3 0)] >
Next time we will try to solve this for
n jugs :)
Originally published on hittaruki.info
Sign up now and apply for roles at companies that interest you.
Engineers who find a new job through Python Works average a 15% increase in salary.Start with GitHubStart with TwitterStart with Stack OverflowStart with Email